New York Trilogy

The New York Trilogy
Bok av Paul Auster
The remarkable, acclaimed series of interconnected detective novels from the author of 4 3 2 1: A NovelThe New York Review of Books has called Paul Auster's work ';one of the most distinctive niches in contemporary literature.' Moving at the breathless pace of a thriller, this uniquely stylized triology of detective novels begins withCity of Glass,in which Quinn, a mystery writer, receives an ominous phone call in the middle of the night. He's drawn into the streets of New York, onto an elusive case that's more puzzling and more deeply-layered than anything he might have written himself. In Ghosts, Blue, a mentee of Brown, is hired by White to spy on Black from a window on Orange Street. Once Blue starts stalking Black, he finds his subject on a similar mission, as well. In The Locked Room, Fanshawe has disappeared, leaving behind his wife and baby and nothing but a cache of novels, plays, and poems.This Penguin Classics Deluxe Edition includes an introduction from author and professor Luc Sante, as well as a pulp novel-inspired cover from Art Spiegelman, Pulitzer Prize-winning graphic artist of Maus and In the Shadow of No Towers.For more than seventy years, Penguin has been the leading publisher of classic literature in the English-speaking world. With more than 1,700titles, Penguin Classics represents a global bookshelf of the best works throughout history and across genres and disciplines. Readers trust theseries to provide authoritative texts enhanced by introductions and notes by distinguished scholars and contemporary authors, as well as up-to-datetranslations by award-winning translators.
Denna bok är en sådan bok som sådana som gillar inception skulle gilla att läsa. Nöjet ligger i att hitta dem små pusselbitarna och hitta meningen med boken, om det ens finns någon. Post-modernism i all ära, så är detta nästintill satir på den. Det finns så många små brödsmulorna som rakt ut nämns dess betydelse, att det poteniellt roliga dör ut. Litar inte Auster på hans läsare? Eller är det så att det är så viktigt att det blir en djup och filosofisk bok att han kännt att han behövt skriva referenser rakt ut, och tagit död på en del av bokens poteniella charm.

Med det sagt, så var den andra boken faktiskt en intressant tappning på dektiv romanen.